At 12:01 am this midnight past, the State of California put Tookie Williams to death for a crime he maintained right up until the end of his life that he did not commit. I was against this, not because I feel Tookie was innocent, (whatever the hell that means) but because I oppose a state-administered death penalty of any kind, and also because I feel like this particular case had factors above and beyond those normally associated incarceration and punishment.
I oppose the death penalty, this latest round of which turns 30 next year, making me slightly older than the current death penalty. I don't oppose it because I feel that it is inherently wrong to take a murderer's life - even though that is a little Biblical for my tastes - I oppose it for the reasons most good Squidbags do - I think it's racist, unfair, wrongly applied, rash, and frequently lies in the hands of people like former Austrian rent boy Arnold Schwarzenegger, who just wasn't convinced Tookie had done enough of a turnaround, or was doing enough for society to remain alive in prison for the rest of his natural life. Arnold, who used to swallow strangers' jism for a living, not acknowledging someone else's turnaround. Wow. Not satisfied with killing folks pretend, he had to get one for real. I really can't think of anything that personifies a "girly-man" more than an actor (not the most muy macho of professions) hiding behind the State Seal and voting for someone to die because he's not convincing enough. Fuck you, Arnold.
Redemption is a big topic right now. I guess that people needed to be able to say Tookie had redeemed himself to deserve to continue living. Fuck that. If he did what he was convicted of having done, then he got what he deserved by having his normal life stripped away from him. There is no way to truly balance the scales for some things, and the best a person can do afterwards is live as best they can and try to make amends. I don't know that he ever tried to make amends with the families of the people he's accused of having killed, but since he claimed he didn't do it, that complicates things. I know he tried to live a better life and give back - and I know the victims' families didn't get a damn thing out of watching Tookie die. And the message for those kids and teenagers who took heart and carved out a better path because of something Tookie said or wrote? You got me, man - that's a pretty fucked message the state just sent them.
If someone killed your whole family and you killed them yourself, it would serve a need. I could even argue that that act would be justice. It would also make you a killer. You would be the agent of change in the situation, and have to deal with the consequences of the unnatural balance you forced into that equation. You would then have to live your life to balance out the killing you had done. Equanimity of one kind or another is achieved. When the government offs someone, they are meant to serve as proxy for someone - presumably the victim - but this couldn't feel further from the truth. They just do what they do - taxes, wars, raising interest rates, lying, killing folks - all functions of government, and none of them has anything to do with justice. They are parts of the system, and they get done because they are there to be done.
The short version is that I think Tookie's death is another in a long line of needless killings that don't change a thing and are rendered meaningless because of the circumstances under which they occur. The death penalty is unjust, outmoded, and has never served to be anything other than retributive. Maybe one or two high-profile deaths like Tookie's will make people think it over.
Recent Comments